Some railfans would not have taken this picture, due to the position of the signal, which obstructs the view of the train. But it does give you an idea of how “L” train movements were hampered during the nearly five years of operation on temporary trackage along Van Buren Street from 1953 to 1958. As the expressway, to the left, appears unfinished, I would guess this picture dates to around 1954. All trains had to come to a complete stop at each intersection, which is likely how that signal operates. I believe the cross street here is Western Avenue, and we are facing west. (Walter Hulseweder Photo)
Chicago author Robert Loerzel has written an article for Chicago public radio about the people who were displaced by the construction of the Eisenhower (formerly Congress) expressway. (It’s also a podcast, which you can listen to here.)
Several of the images used in “Displaced” were sourced from a series of blog posts I wrote for the CERA Members Blog a few years ago. My focus was on how the expressway project transformed the old Garfield Park “L” into today’s median rapid transit line. Robert’s piece takes a different tack, but is fascinating nonetheless.
Here are links to some of those posts:
Somewhere West of Laramie (March 22, 2013)
The Great Subway Flood of 1957 (April 24, 2013)
CA&E Mystery Photos Contest Answers (May 19, 2013)
Scenes Along the Garfield Park “L” (July 31, 2013)
From Garfield “L” to Congress Median Part 4, Part 5, and Part 6 (August 22 to December 1, 2013) – Some of the articles listed above make up the first three posts in this series.
You can also find additional pictures of expressway construction in previous Trolley Dodger posts. Just type “Congress” or “Garfield” into the search window at the top of this page, and links to these things will come up.
A Few Thoughts on “Displaced”
Although the article doesn’t mention it, some buildings that were in the way of the expressway were moved rather than torn down. House moving, and building moving, seems to be a long Chicago tradition. (In 1929, Our Lady of Lourdes church at 1601 W. Leland was moved, lock stock and barrel, across the street to permit the widening of Ashland.)
In the old CERA blog, I posted pictures of a five-story building being moved near downtown, and a brick apartment building further west.
I know that there were houses moved as far west as Maywood during the expressway construction. Of course, since that was an area with lower density, it would have been easy to find empty lots.
I am pretty sure some buildings in Oak Park were also moved. Contemporary newspaper accounts say so.
As for where the people went who were displaced by the highway, my guess is they were dispersed all over the place, and some moved to other parts of the city and not just to the suburbs as the article implies. Most likely, a majority of displaced residents remained in the city.
Keep in mind that in the period after WWII, when construction began, there were still areas of the city that had not yet been developed.
During WWII, in the area of Galewood where I used to live, fully half the lots were still vacant. In the early 1960s, the last of these vacant lots got developed. (We did not get paved alleys until 1964. I was surprised recently when in Edgebrook to see that there are still unpaved alleys in that otherwise built-up neighborhood.)
And while I am sure that some of the Italians from the old neighborhood ended up in Elmwood Park, when my family moved there in 1964, it was still largely German. It became a lot more Italian after 1964, more than 10 years after people in the expressway’s path would have been displaced.
Although “Displaced” implies that expressway construction was responsible for the Jewish migration from the west side to the north side, I believe this trend was already occurring, going back to the 1930s.
As for the “Burnham connection” between his 1909 Plan of Chicago and the Congress expressway, there is a connection, but it’s more of a zig-zag line than a straight line.
Yes, Daniel Burnham envisioned an improved roadway along Congress, but this would have been more of a landscaped boulevard than a modern expressway. There weren’t a lot of automobiles in 1909, and the idea of such a highway didn’t exist yet. However, with publication of the plan, speculators bought up land along its path, and as time went on, wanted to cash in.
While the old Main Post Office building, as expanded in 1932, left a space for Burnham’s Congress parkway, as late as 1937, the roadway’s future was in considerable doubt.
It did not appear in highway plans proposed in 1937 by Mayor Edward J. Kelly, which favored turning several of Chicago’s “L”s (the Douglas, Humboldt Park, and Lake Street lines) into a disconnected series of elevated highways, which would have resembled New York’s ill-fated West Side Elevated Highway.
Chances are, this plan would have been a disaster. It would have decimated large parts of our rapid transit system, without really solving the highway problem as a whole. Since the City sought federal money for the project, as a works project, it needed the approval of FDR’s Harold L. Ickes. He did not like the plan.
Ickes put his clout behind a Congress parkway expressway, plans for which were finally approved in 1939.
We are gratified that posts we have made in this, and in our previous blog, are being used by researchers looking for source material. That has always been our goal.
For Further Reading
Of particular interest is a 1952 letter, sent by the Chicago, Aurora & Elgin interurban to their shareholders, detailing the railroad’s position at the beginnings of the expressway construction project.
If any of you have read Cooperation Moves the Public (Dispatch 1 of the Shore Line Interurban Historical Society) by Bruce Moffat, you know how CA&E operations on the CTA’s Garfield Park “L” depended on a high degree of professionalism and split-second timing. Once service on the “L” was shifted to the slow and ponderous temporary trackage on Van Buren Street, this level of service became impossible.
Whatever difficulties the CTA experienced from 1953 to 1958 with this operation would have been exacerbated by the additional of CA&E trains. The interurban was truly put into an impossible situation, which left them with little choice but to either sell out to another entity such as the CTA, or liquidate entirely.
Once the expressway portion crossing the DesPlaines River opened in October 1960, there would have been additional ridership losses on the CA&E, which was also facing stiff competition from the Chicago & North Western, which had by then put new air-conditioned bi-levels into service.
In the long run, if CA&E had survived, ridership would eventually have bounced back. But the railroad was unable to survive the many lean times that would have been ahead. The CA&E’s main interest in the 1950s became a gradual liquidation of assets, with the proceeds being distributed among their shareholders.
My conclusion is that the CA&E could only have been saved through a pro-active plan adopted at the beginnings of highway construction, and not the last-ditch efforts at the end. (See also our earlier post The CTA, the CA&E, and “Political Influence”, February 18, 2015).
Here is the original agreement between Oak Park and the State of Illinois for the construction of the expressway.
Plans were changed as they went along. Oak Park had the highway reduced by one lane in each direction, because of the number of buildings that would need to be demolished. Entrance and exit ramps at East Avenue were cancelled, after the village objected. They thought that this would detract from the quiet residential nature of the neighborhood, and would also lead to the widening of East Avenue.
Through Oak Park, both the rapid transit line and the B&O CT freight line were originally intended to run in the middle of the highway, but this would have cut off several local businesses from rail service, probably putting them out of business. Therefore, plans were changed so that the rail lines were put to the south of expressway traffic. There were a couple ramps along the freight line that connected to sidings. One was just east of Austin Boulevard, the other east of Harlem Avenue. Those are no longer in use.
Today, the only customer that still uses the freight line in this area is the Ferrara Candy Company in Forest Park.
Here are some Oak Park newspaper articles, covering the period from 1945 to 1960 concerning expressway construction:
In 2010, the Village of Oak Park proposed making the unusual left-hand exit and entrance ramps at Harlem and Austin landmarks. You can read some of that correspondence here.
-David Sadowski
It’s 1953, and just prior to the opening of the temporary Van Buren trackage, we see a test train crossing Paulina. The streetcar tracks are for CTA route 9 – Ashland, which was still in service until early 1954. The photographer was standing on the platform at Marshfield Junction. The tracks veering off to the right, where Logan Square and Humboldt Park trains once ran, had been out of service since 1951. Garfield and Douglas trains were still running on the “L” when this picture was taken.
The Van Buren Street temporary trackage as it appeared on July 17, 1954. The two-car train of flat-door 6000s may be 6071-6072. As for the cross street, my guess is California Avenue (2800 W.) meaning we are near the west end of the 2 1/2 miles of temporary right-of-way. There is a CTA bus just barely visible behind the train. Since the “L” made no stops along this section, bus service continued on Van Buren, even though it was only half a street for five years. Just to the left of the train, you can see streetcar trackage that would have been used until 1951. (Ed Malloy Photo)
Van Buren at California today. We are looking to the east.
Another view of the Van Buren trackage, circa 1953 since the old “L” is still extant at right.
In this March 17, 1958 photo by Kelly Powell, I think we are looking at construction just west of the Loop related to the Northwest expressway, and not Congress. By 1958, any such work for Congress had been taken care of years earlier. On the other hand, as of this date, CTA service was still running on the old Met “L” east of Aberdeen Street (1100 West), and would have crossed the NW highway footprint just east of Halsted. Once service in this area was shifted to the new expressway median line in June 1958, this section of “L” was removed.
CA&E 430 heads up a two car train at DesPlaines Avenue in the 1950s, while some CTA 6000s are at right.
To show you just how bad Chicago’s postwar housing shortage was, some people purchased surplus streetcar bodies for use as temporary homes. The caption on this press photo reads, “OVER-AGE STREET CAR BECOMES FAMILY’S HOME. CHICAGO- Mrs. Edith Sands prepares dinner on the small stove in the over-age streetcar where she and her husband, Arthur, and their five-month-old son, Jimmy, have just moved. The trolley car, which has seen nearly 50 years of service on Chicago streets, was purchased by the Sands at a recent public sale and propped up on a 5-acre site near Chicago’s southern edge. The car is lighted by gasoline lamps.” (April 16, 1946)
In our post Lost and Found: Chicago Streetcar #1137 (June 5, 2015), we wrote about how one of these old streetcars, once used for housing, was recently discovered in Wisconsin. It has since been moved to a museum where it will hopefully be preserved.
If you’ve ever wondered where the old and new CTA tracks converged between 1958 and 1960, this blow-up of an old Roy Benedict map (dated May 15, 1959) shows how it was done. Service east of here began running in the new expressway median as of June 22, 1958, but construction between here and Forest Park was still ongoing, and there were various temporary rights-of-way involved. A track connection was retained to the old Laramie Yard for nearly a year, to permit shop work. This map shows a barrier where the old track connection would have been, probably indicating it had just been cut off. The median line made a turn to the north, immediately after leaving the Lotus Tunnel, to connect up with the old ground-level alignment west of here. All this would have been in the way of extending the Congress expressway west of Central. Once the old tracks connecting with Laramie Yard were removed in mid-1959, the expressway was opened to Central in early 1960. After CTA tracks were put into their current alignment south of the highway, roadwork proceeded quickly and the highway opened as far as First Avenue on October 12, 1960, essentially connecting all the separate links that had been built. On this map, there are diversions where both Central and Austin cross the CTA tracks. At Austin, a bridge was under construction, and at Central, it was an underpass. Regular traffic was routed around this.
Originally, I thought this was early 1960s night shot showed a CTA single-car unit in the 1-50 series, and those cars were used on the Congress-Douglas-Milwaukee line. But as Andre Kristopans has pointed out, the doors on those cars were closer to the ends than this one, which he identifies as being part of the 6511-6720 series. It just looks like there’s one car, since the other “married pair” behind it is not illuminated. This picture was most likely taken at the end of the line at DesPlaines Avenue. Anyway, this prompted some interesting correspondence with Andre Kristopans on the Philly Traction Yahoo Group.
I wrote:
Were the CTA’s single car units (first delivered in 1959), which were designed for one-man operation, ever used as one-car trains on any line besides Evanston or Skokie? I have seen a picture* of a single car on West-Northwest, but that was at the end of the line.
It was my impression that one-car trains were limited to certain lines due to labor union agreements. So, in general, on lines other than Skokie or Evanston, they were run in trains of two cars or longer.
Andre replied:
It COULD have been done, but wasn’t. The 1-50 series of 50 cars were bought with the intent they would be one-man operated. Obviously 50 was way too many for Evanston, in fact only 12 came with trolley poles (39-50) intended for Evanston. Skokie wasn’t even thought of in 1959. The rest were intended apparently for overnight and weekend West-Northwest service, where riding at the time (1959) was quite light. In fact the west side lines had been running single cars since the late 1940’s on some services, such as the Westchester non-rush service where a car was cut off WB from a Forest Park train at Laramie, ran to Westchester and back, then was added back to a Forest Park train. Normal Park on the south side was also a single car cut off an Englewood train at Harvard. Skokie before 1949 was a single woodie, too. But CTA quickly realized that if you had to have a 2-man crew, why not run a 2 car train, so the 1-50 cars always were in pairs on WNW, and used almost exclusively in rush hours.
Me again:
So, in the PCC era, it would have been possible to operate a one-car train on other lines than Evanston or Skokie, but only with a two-man crew?
Andre:
Correct. In the PCC era, single cars were only on Evanston and Skokie. In wood car days, they were used on practically all lines except North-South at one time or another, but with 2-man crews.
*I thought I had seen a picture… see the photo caption above.
The Van Buren Signal System
At intersections, the CTA used an innovative electric eye beam to make sure that stoplights did not change while trains were in the crossing. There were about 15 such cross streets along the 2.5 miles of this surface operation.
In the Comments section for this post, Jeff Weiner and I discussed whether the train signal system on the Van Buren temporary trackage interfaced with the stoplights at the various intersections. I did some research and here’s what I found:
Chicago Tribune, December 14, 1952:
ELECTRIC EYE PLAN PROPOSED FOR C. A. & E.
Aid for Traffic in Van Buren St.
An electronics expert last week put his stamp of approval on the electric eye traffic control system proposed by the city during the temporary operation of Chicago transit authority and Chicago, Aurora and Elgin railway trains at grade level in Van Buren st., pending completion of the Congress st. expressway.
Dean Charles C. Caveny of the Chicago branch of the University of Illinois, an engineer and physical scientist, told the Illinois commerce commission the photo-electric cell system will be satisfactory if properly installed. He said it will probably be as reliable as the more conventional track circuit system.
Testifies at Hearing
The educator testified at a hearing on the Aurora and Elgin petition to suspend rail operations and substitute buses. He said the photoelectric cell system of control is unconventional as far as the proposed type of operation is concerned, but it has been used successfully at the approaches to railroad tunnels.
The city proposes electric eyes at both sides of Van Buren st. intersections. The devices would control north-south traffic signals and would prevent north-south traffic from entering the intersections while trains are in the intersections. The track circuit system does the same thing, but is a much more expensive device.
The city also amended its Van Buren st, operation plan by eliminating five of the 15 intersections crossed by the grade level operations between Sacramento blvd. and Racine av.
Richard A. Walons, a city traffic engineer, testified that CTA officials had said their trains would be unable to maintain a consistent schedule unless the number of intersections was cut down.
Average 11.5 M. P. H.
Walons said that when the grade level operation begins, probably in the spring. Campbell, Washtenaw, and Hoyne avs., and Throop and Laflin sts. will be barricaded to north-south traffic. The move is designed to allow trains to average 11.5 miles per hour in the street.
Under questioning by Joseph T. Zoline, attorney for the Aurora and Elgin, Walons said this was about the sixth plan the city has proposed for the operation. The Aurora and Elgin contended any Van Buren st. operation would not be safe.
Then, on August 14, 1953, the Tribune reported:
Electronic Signal Protection on Ground Level L
A modern electronic signal system has been installed for the operation of Garfield Park elevated trains in temporary tracks at ground level between Racine and Sacramento avs., Walter J. McCarter, general manager of the Chicago transit authority, announced yesterday.
The signal system will govern the operation of trains at 10 street intersections along the temporary route in Van Buren st. All trains will stop at all crossings, with the electronic system providing special signals to instruct the motormen. Electric “eyes” at the intersections will hold traffic lights at red until the trains have cleared the crossings.
The temporary tracks at grade level were necessitated by the construction of the Congress st. super-highway, which requires razing of the elevated tracks. Regular use of the new route is scheduled to begin Sept. 15. The CTA will begin experimenting with the temporary route next week.
So, trains of the Van Buren trackage probably followed this procedure:
1. Trains pull up to a signal at each intersection, come to a complete stop, and look both ways for oncoming traffic
2. If the light is green, proceed with caution. The train breaks an electric eye beam, and as long as it is still in the intersection, the traffic light is prevented from turning green for north-south traffic.
3. If the light is red, wait for it to cycle and see step 2.
When I was a kid, the old High-Low grocery store in my neighborhood had an electric eye beam that opened the door automatically. This is not all that different from the technology used on the Van Buren operation.
I imagine CTA was naturally concerned that you could have a situation where the train started to cross the street, the light changed to green for cross traffic, and a vehicle, having the right-of-way, would try to cut in front of the train, potentially causing an accident. Without some way to change the regular sequence of red and green lights, this was a possibility, which the addition of the electric eye system helped prevent.
A wooden “Met” car was one of the first test trains on the CTA’s Van Buren temporary trackage. The date is August 18, 1953. Testing continued for a month to familiarize pedestrians and motorists with the operation.
Recent Additions
An improved scan of the following picture has been added to our previous post Around Town (August 19, 2016):
Here is a very interesting photograph that could only have been taken in a limited time period. It shows the 4-track Met “L” right-of-way looking east from Marshfield, with a train of newish flat-door 6000s assigned to Douglas. The street at left is Van Buren, and while the area has been cleared out for construction of the Congress (now Eisenhower) expressway (I290), work has not yet begun on the temporary right-of-way that would replace the “L” structure in this area starting in September 1953. I believe this work began in late 1951, shortly after streetcar service on Van Buren was replaced by buses. The first 6000s assigned to Douglas were sent there between September and December 1951. Since this is a wintry scene, chances are the date of this photo is circa December 1951. The building protruding at the center is the old Throop Street Shops.
These three images have been added to our post Night Beat (June 21, 2016):
Toronto Peter Witt 2766 at Vincent Loop in November 1964. (R. McMann Photo)
TTC crane C-2 at work at Queen Street and Eastern Avenue in October 1966. (R. McMann Photo)
A postcard view of C-2 at work in 1967.
And for our friends at the Illinois Railway Museum, here are four classic views of Chicago red Pullman 144, one of the earliest additions to the museum’s collection:
CTA red Pullman 144, as it looked at 77th and Vincennes in 1958, just prior to the abandonment of streetcar service in Chicago. The occasion was most likely the final red car fantrip, which took place on May 25th.
144, looking somewhat worse for the wear, at the Illinois Railway Museum in Union on May 15, 1967. (K. C. Henkels Photo)
Another view of 144 on May 15, 1967. Some makeshift repairs are in evidence on this car, nine years after it last operated in Chicago. It has since been one of IRM’s mainstays. (K. C. Henkels Photo)
144 at the Illinois Railway Museum, probably in the 1980s.
E-Book Additions
FYI, a seven page article from the January 1939 of Mass Transportation, taking an in-depth look at the entire Chicago public transit system, has been added to our E-books The “New Look” in Chicago Transit: 1938-1973 and Chicago’s PCC Streetcars: The Rest of the Story. Both are available via our Online Store.
If you have already purchased one of these discs, an updated version is available for just $5, with free shipping withing the United States. Contact us at thetrolleydodger@gmail.com for further details.
Concerning CSL’s Madison route, the article notes that “this operation is conducted entirely with P.C.C. cars of a type representing nearly as great an advance over the standard P.C.C. car as that car was an advance over the types previously operated.”
Andre Kristopans: “#4 is at McCormick Blvd on the Skokie branch, the bridge over the North Shore Channel, etc. #5 is an EB? train at Sacramento on the Garfield line.”
Help Support The Trolley Dodger
This is our 153rd post, and we are gradually creating a body of work and an online resource for the benefit of all railfans, everywhere. To date, we have received over 192,000 page views, for which we are very grateful.
You can help us continue our original transit research by checking out the fine products in our Online Store. You can make a contribution there as well.
As we have said before, “If you buy here, we will be here.”
We thank you for your support.
The shot of cars at Desplaines Av are not 1-50’s, but 6511-6720 series standard cars. 1-50’s had doors closer to the ends of the car.
The CRT montage photos – #4 is at McCormick Blvd on the Skokie branch, the bridge over the North Shore Channel, etc. #5 is an EB? train at Sacramento on the Garfield line.
Thanks for the correction, and the additional information.
Oh, now I wish I still had access to the traffic signal files at CDOT, to see if there were any drawings and timings for the Van Buren temporary tracks. Twenty seven years with the City, and I was always handling those files, and you’d think I would have looked!
Hindsight is 20/20!
The signal system was described in a Chicago Tribune article before construction was finished. I believe the way it worked was to force each train to come to a complete stop at each intersection, wait until the stoplight cycled through, and then proceeded on the green.
So perhaps there was a way that the approach of an oncoming train would have changed the signal on the stoplight as well, so traffic on the cross street would get a green light, and Van Buren a red light?
No, most likely the controllers ran on fixed cycles. The City wasn’t big on actuated equipment back in the 1950’s since it used vacuum tubes, and was notoriously sensitive to vibration (like from trains hitting rail joints).
I looked up the Tribune articles that describe how the signal system worked. The text (and a picture) has been added to this post, thanks.
Dick Walons! He’s the man who hired me in 1983, and retired the next year. Nice guy, very knowledgeable, very hands-on section head. Sadly, he died several years ago from complications of Alzheimer’s. I may have been wrong about the controllers, but I’d have to look at the files. The set-up may have been entirely electromechanical .
Small world, eh?
As far as white flight from the west side is concerned, I would say the expressway construction had almost nothing to do with it. Much of the cause was the great Postwar Prosperity, where a lot of people who in the 1930’s could not dream of suburbia now could, and did. In turn many blacks had the means of move up also, from the closer-in areas to a bit further out, where houses were further apart, which fueled the departure of more on the white former residents. By the early 50’s, the black area was up to the east edge of Garfield Park, but did not really cross that boundary until the mid-60’s. During the 1967 riots after King’s assassination the “riot zone” was Cicero to Ashland, Chicago to Cermak more or less, where all transit service as suspended for several days. Expansion to Austin and north to North Avenue came in the 1970’s and 1980’s. Also note that construction of the Northwest (Kennedy) and South (Dan Ryan) expressways did not cause any exoduses from then-white areas, despite being just as disruptive. So I would say these were two unconnected events that just happened to coincide.
I would tend to agree with your conclusions. The City of Chicago was actively engaged in “urban renewal” in the 1950s and would not have left the near west side alone, even if the expressway had never been built. Radical transformations took place in many other areas of Chicago at about the same time as this, even in areas that had no new highways.
For example, a neighborhood was bulldozed in the early 1950s to clear the way for the Lake Meadows Apartments. This included the City selling a few blocks of Cottage Grove avenue to developers. Pictures of the Cottage Grove streetcar taken between 33rd and 35th in this period show an area that looks totally devastated.
Similarly, entire neighborhoods were torn down for other large projects such as the Illinois Institute of Technology and the University of Illinois.
https://thetrolleydodger.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/img250-tif.jpg
West of the Lotus Tunnel, the new line opened in two sections:
Pine (a block east of Central) to Pine (a block west of Central) November 1959, 16 months after the line to the east.
Pine to Desplaines March 1960.
The big underpass at Central was apparently the source of some problems. Initially the temporary track north of the original line in the area was put into service in August of 1954, but then the temporary tracks had to be relocated further north in July of 1956. Once opened, almost three and a half years later, the underpass did not yet eliminate the grade crossing at Central. The station consisted of two outside platforms for another year almost, until October of 1960 when the island platform and underpass opened, and a slight realignment was made in the tracks east of the underpass where the grade crossing had been.
Nothing to do with current topic… BUT
I grew up in Chicago and just found this sight. This is A GREAT SITE! one of best I’ve seen.
My question to everyone is.
Does the old CTA grave yard for transit trains still exist? If not where was it located?
NEXT: Explanation why I ask. I’ll try to make it short.
As a kid around 1968 to 1970 on a drive with dad and his brothers drive past this graveyard full of stacked transit trains .
No don’t know what type model years the trains were?
Like the flat door trains some with the curve at bottom. All with the windows you cranked up.
I’ve searched and searched the Internet and can never find any pictures or location of this grave yard . If anyone knows anything about pictures, location or Web site of it would be great!
All I recall was in car driving past seeing all these old subway elevated transit trains stacked up about 4 high.
It was both amazing yet sad sight when I realized they were being junked stacked to scrap.
Sounds like a junk yard to me. The only place I recall seeing old CTA rapid transit cars lying around was at Skokie Shops. In 1968-70, there would have been very few 6000s scrapped, just a few that were in accidents. On the other hand, there would have been lots of 4000s scrapped, and also the last of the wooden “L” cars that were used in work service. Perhaps one of our readers may know what you saw, thanks.
6000s weren’t scrapped in any large numbers until the 1980s, and even then, some were shipped off to Philadelphia for use on the Norristown High-Speed Line.
[…] (now Eisenhower) expressway, is already showing signs of urban decay. We discuss this in our post Some Thoughts on “Displaced” (August 30, […]
[…] (now Eisenhower) expressway, is already showing signs of urban decay. We discuss this in our post Some Thoughts on “Displaced” (August 30, […]
Regarding the picture of car “78”…that was a legitimate renumbering of a car in the 1780-series, to open up the roster for a new order of buses. Alan Lind’s book on the CSL makes mention of it. I’ve seen a few other pictures of the car, but only on the Fifth Avenue shuttle…it served for a fairly brief time before being scrapped.
My mother and her family lived on Chicago’s west side from the early-mid 1950s to about 1964. The family moved there from Hot Springs, AR in 1954 when my mother was off in the Air Force; she came to Chicago for the first time the following year, when she was on leave. Her parents filled her in quickly on the situation…from her recollection the “color line” in 1954 was at California Avenue, and the area from there west to Kedzie was a bit of a no man’s land. She clearly recalled being told not to get off the bus east of Kedzie…if it broke down, she was to wait on board, no matter what, until the next one showed up. Also, Garfield Park itself was deceiving…it looked inviting, but her parents warned her that it was dangerous, especially at night.
Her description of the West Garfield Park neighborhood, where her family lived, was of a predominantly Italian and Irish blue-collar community that seemed “tired” but still active…actual “decline” didn’t seem to start showing up until about 1961. Amanda Seligman’s book “Block By Block” is an invaluable resource for understanding what happened to the west side after WW2. Seligman describes the west side as “the forgotten side” of Chicago, sort of an urban unwanted stepchild…it was the last major area to be settled and developed before the Depression brought everything to a halt, and even before the postwar urban changes it was ranking near the bottom for city services and new development, due to its comparative lack of political clout.
I’ll check that out in Lind’s book, thanks.
From what I have read, the City thought that the west side was in an economic decline before the expressway was built. Highways were cut through many other Chicago neighborhoods, and yet it only seems to be the west side where people associate it in such a negative way. No doubt the disruption caused by the project did not help. But the run down areas of the city would eventually have been cleared by “urban renewal” anyway.
Although it has taken many decades, good things are happening on the west side now. It is on the upswing.
C&WT 101 on the Madison line. Don Ross: “101 was built by McGuire-Cummings in 1917. It was scrapped in 1948.”
This is looking north on 19th St across the C&NW tracks in Melrose Park, IL.
Thanks! This was actually a comment on a photo posted to Around Town (August 19, 2016).
[…] (now Eisenhower) expressway, is already showing signs of urban decay. We discuss this in our post Some Thoughts on “Displaced” (August 30, […]
[…] the people who were living in the path of the Congress expressway when it was built. (See our post Some Thoughts on Displaced, August 30, […]
[…] Some Thoughts on “Displaced” (August 30, […]